HOME             ARCHIVES            PREFACE         OAQ           BACKSTORY           BIBLIOGRAPHY           COMMENT

How do I understand television?

     Television, as I historically remember it, changed when President Clinton signed the Telecommunications Act of 1996.  My entire professional media career changed with it.  But then, my TV experiences rarely jibed with common mythology.  I never saw one speck of the dire predictions eagerly claiming “the death of television”.  I saw the opposite.  I found television to be a well-oiled self-sufficient money-printing machine.  I never found any trace of an independent or liberal media anywhere inside the television industry.  I never once witnessed ‘journalism’ ethically struggle against corporatized control.  Instead, I met people there who winked and nodded like all business people do.  My growing curiosities slowly

  “I never found any trace of an independent or liberal media anywhere inside the television industry.

turned to revulsion, which eventually killed my career ambitions.  After 25 years and 10 Emmys, I quit the media business and determined to understand TV from differing perspectives; through more accurate and critical means.

      To help foreground my unique approach to understanding television, all my videos are made in the comfort and privacy of my own home while watching a 15” TV screen.  Most every day, when I am not outdoors planting trees, I simultaneously watch four major U.S. 24hour news channels: CNN, FOX News, MSNBC, and CNBC. 

      I also typically watch a range of live TV events: daily news & talk shows, elections, celebrations, sports, etc., for these are where we typically find informational media production on display in its primary forms.  I also collect a wide variety of historical examples of media making.  These range from individual artistic expressions to exemplars of common media memory.  Daily, to augment these limited informational media sources, I also learn elsewhere: CSPAN, PBS, NPR, NYT, WSJ, WaPo, IBD, The Guardian, The Globe and Mail, among others.  I also read philosophy, often Thoreau, in bed.  This sketches my daily media bubble.

      What I do not watch is the other 90% of TV’s content, which is purposefully fictional and/or anti-informational.  I almost never go to the cinema.  I very rarely access YouTube.  I do not own a cell phone.  I have never Facebook’ed, texted, swiped, played a video game, interacted with touch-screens or donned a VR headset.  I own no apps.  Nor do I subscribe to NetFlix, Hulu, HBO or any of a host of other televisual venues available to North American consumers.  I do not read Reddit, Politico, The Onion, Huffington Post, Boing Boing, Mashable, The Drudge Report, Breitbart News.  I leave research into these media sources to other more ambitious ethnographers.  There are only so many hours in my day.

      In my home, my TV is directly connected to my computer.  While watching TV, I ‘rip‘ normative idiosyncrasies that echo from my TV screen and then I download these into my computer hard drive.  As I collect these video fillips, I itemize and archive each into folders listed under a variety of topical headings.  Later, I combine and re-function these fillips to create various critical examinations.  I often re-negotiate these yet again into even longer videos, typically about 30 minutes in length. 

  “My projects, therefore, should be viewed as critical educational methods for self-training -- autodidactic praxis.

The entire process takes a great deal of time and effort, but it is rather simple and inexpensive to do.  Since 2003, when I first began video bricolage at home, I have archived countless individual clips totaling well over 20 terabytes of re-usable material -- which includes many examples of ethical media production as well.

      All content within this site was montaged by me alone, although much of it, obviously, was previously ‘produced’ by many-many others...mostly anonymous mediamongers.  The only two digital tools I use are, by today’s app-happy standards, so simple they are reminisced much like paper and pencil: iMovie-6 software (2006) and an iMac computer (2009).  Content here is collected and presented neither as ‘fine art’ or as ‘bloopers’ -- nor as a trap for the gaze -- but as ethnographic exemplars of the consequences inside historical communicational technique. 

      I do this purposefully, since Media and Art can no longer stand under any democratic or revolutionary law of strategy; although the “work of art” can (potentially) be redeemed for countering reification: Art for Thinking.  My projects, therefore, should be viewed as critical educational methods for self-training -- autodidactic praxis -- which should be robustly employed inside all media pedagogy.  (For example, Cultural Farming can be a useful method to intellectually assay the “truthiness” of Quenton Tarantino’s (sic) “vermisitude”.)  Indeed, when the viable notion of Carnivalesque today is worse than stupidly produced, critical polyphonic methods like Cultural Farming often reveal that Thinking Art can sometimes be more productive than ‘truth’ itself... without the use of narcotics.


                                       

Preface Intro

What is going on here?

How should viewers watch these video essays?

Introduction to the research.

What does understanding television mean?

How do I understand television?

What does using theory mean?

Can you discuss one of your videos?

What was discovered in this research?

What if viewers still don’t ‘understand’ television?






HOLLAND WILDE

An American

resident of Canada, experimenting with new forms of critical media ethnography in Cultural Farming




HOME             ARCHIVES            PREFACE         OAQ           BACKSTORY           BIBLIOGRAPHY           COMMENT